When will Single Fathers be treated equal to Single mothers? - federal anti spam law
http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/single- ...
"Single parents are parents who treat their children, but as an open wallet, whose only goal in life to pay for it and pay for, and whose only motivation, something that should not do try to pay and pay and his to control ex-wife and children. "
"At least we can get Congress to pass a federal law against spam. Parents should not hold your breath waiting for the time before a national court" Parents hold their children's lives involves "law"
Federal Anti Spam Law When Will Single Fathers Be Treated Equal To Single Mothers?
12 comments:
JESUS LOVES YOU = Yes lose more women their rights.
That is correct.
I know men have won more and keep their children from their mothers.
Is it sad?
Probably never. Its just plain sexist legal systems that deny parents that their children are ready and able.
Doubtfire-Men must hurt terribly by Act of Congress for the rights of fathers who are. They fit perfectly parents are legally deprived of their children ... should not be.
I do not think that everyone thinks that the way just for you it.I have made a lot of respect for single parents, I can not do a single mom helps me understand how difficult it is to educate a child is alone.
I do not think that everyone thinks that the way just for you it.I have made a lot of respect for single parents, I can not do a single mom helps me understand how difficult it is to educate a child is alone.
I do not think that everyone thinks that the way just for you it.I have made a lot of respect for single parents, I can not do a single mom helps me understand how difficult it is to educate a child is alone.
I know, should display a balance. Another problem in the homes of domestic violence against her husband. It happens more often than you think, but it is spoken.
Where elves and unicorns created.
"It'sa man's world!"
-James Brown
(RIP)
My experience as a divorce lawyer with a practice that for 70% of men, many of whom are parents, not with this opinion. If people want more time to educate the children, are usually questions of suitability is missing. Child Support is based on income and parental time. If you think there is a more equitable way of determining child support, letters to the legislators, because they are trying very hard, the inequality between the sexes outside the law.
Frankly, until I show that only parents suffer the financial consequences, such as single mothers, I think you're just an excuse for what his aunt.
Edit: Yes, sometimes parents are able to fool the judges - and there are children who died after being given to the parents, even (and brutal, horrific murders, I might add). More work must be objective, because if you think I am, by men who were drawn against them affected, think again (that is, they reject the objectivity, if you refuse my hand reaction).
I think that is the question of whether to cooperate to learn are two adults, to educate their own children? It is sad that the law has not done all these things. Why can not father and mother? Commitment? Contribute same? Spend time with the children now? Or, GASP, even if a couple divorced, not yet mature enough to be polite with your child while at the same time? It is very sad that children have to be measures such as birthdays, parties, attend events, and so far from a parent or the other because both are not mature, civil and entertaining game for a few hours for the benefit of the child. The real question is when they become adults, they act like adults. The law makes the best, but what is really there to do? There are many women than men are milk for all the support that the child is worth it, then turn around and let their kids do not see. And there are many deadbeat fathers who have no money or, worse yet, no time to their children either. And there are manyParents who do nothing but argue with each other and it is impossible, in the interest of the children who interact one of them finally happened. So really, the question is, when adults for adults will behave like adults? Therefore, the law is not to make "one size fits all" laws for everyone, because every situation is different. For those few parents who have to be what the life of your child, you have a lot of things that are bad influences, drug addicts, alcoholics, abusive parents, etc., and vice versa, with the mothers. The law is not as much as possible, but in reality can not be everything to everyone equally.
PS Yes, many men have right to life of his son. There are many mothers out there who prevent their children, their father, many of whom are grandparents, only to minors. That's just sad.
Why do we need a law or what it takes to be a part of the life of a child? Why waste taxpayers 'money care' for is something that parents should do first. If you want part of your child's life of children, then do it. You're not an Act of Congress need to do.
Well, if I all the thumbs down, I'll tell you what I think .... If you believe everything you name bunk bed, it's their choice. There is no state in this country, that the father of her child's life of the child. You have to respect what the court orders be set. If you are a part of your life, then do it. If it hold a plea, a father of his children as child abuse (sexual or not), then that is very good. will have no right, with children.
Here, here .... Ruth, I received $ 59.00 per week for two children .... Food is only $ 59 per week does not count, clothing, shelter, heat, medical care, school supplies, dental and vision care, shoes .....
Right?
Guess where most of my salary went .... Children.
I suspect most of her ..... no children.
If the proportion of non-wage noncustodial parent, the child support is actually the cost of educating a child and each parent has an equal share of the actual cost .. come to me complaining .. Until then, understanding of the custodial parent takes much of the financial burden of raising children .... its cost-share stood at 22% of gross pay less FICA ... my social costs were more than triple that in reality, because I am the custodial parent. And each time I return I tried to get ..... For example, who said not even do that, he, because of the gifts to the church .... The judge lifted the church donations .... . and then stopped to go to church .... lol
... FYI and arrears twice awarded ..... maybe I should not have.
Post a Comment